###
气象:2007,33(5):94-99
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
我国中部地区自动站与人工站气温的差异及原因分析
(中国气象科学研究院,北京 100081)
Causality of Temperature Differences Between AWS and Manual Observations in Central Part of China
(Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,Beijing 100081)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 847次   下载 1931
投稿时间:2006-10-30    修订日期:2007-04-02
中文摘要: 在我国,地面自动气象观测系统正在取代常规主要气象要素的观测,即人工观测 的 器测项目,新旧两种观测系统之间存在一定的差异。从气候科学的观点来看,这种差异会造 成均一性数据集的开发以及极端天气事件的分析的误差甚至错误,所以将两种系统所获取的 资料进行对比是非常必要的。计算了我国中部地区21个气象站2005年的年平均差值,对 其中的6个国家基准气候站逐小时数据按照云量、风速、白天和黑夜进行分类对比,并将仪 器所处环境、太阳辐射(夜间为辐射冷却)、仪器原理及观测方法的变化认为是气温差异产 生的主要因素。研究表明:两种仪器观测的气温年平均差值基本上在±0.2℃之内。在 上述差异因素中,大多数的台站仪器差异基本在±0.1℃之间,观测方法差异、仪器环境差 异也比较小,而与太阳辐射有关的差异最大。
中文关键词: 自动气象站  人工观测  气温  仪器差异
Abstract:The Automated Surface Observing System is currently replacing conventi onal observations in China. There are differences between the old and new measur ing systems. From a climatological viewpoint,it probably causes the errors when developing the homogeneous datasets and investigating climatic change,and anal yzing the extreme weather events. So it is necessary to compare the data from th e two systems. By means of computing the annual average differences of 21 weathe r stations in the Central China in 2005, and sorting analysis hourly data of 6 national climate stations according to cloud amount,wind speed, day and night, the differences in sitecharacteristics, solar radiation(IR cooling in night), instrument system and observing practice are considered the main factors. It is showed that the annual average difference of temperature is almost within ±0.2 ℃. Among the above mentioned four factors, the instrument bias plays a part ro le,about 0.1℃ at most stations,the bias about local effect and observing prac tice are very little,but the bias of radiation is the largest.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:
引用文本:
余君,胡玉峰,刘均,2007.我国中部地区自动站与人工站气温的差异及原因分析[J].气象,33(5):94-99.
Yu Jun,Hu Yufeng,Liu Jun,2007.Causality of Temperature Differences Between AWS and Manual Observations in Central Part of China[J].Meteor Mon,33(5):94-99.